Home
Back
In Russian
Türkic-Sumerian
Datelines
Sources
Roots
Alphabet
Writing
Language
Religion
Genetics
Geography
Archeology
Religion
Coins
Wikipedia
Ogur and Oguz
Türkic languages
Classification of Türkic languages
Indo-European, Dravidian, and Rigveda
Türkic and European Genetic distance
Türkic in Slavic
Türkic in English
Türkic, Slavic and Iranian
Türkic in Romance
Alans in Pyrenees
Türkic in Greek
Türkic-Etruscan
Alan Dateline
Avar Dateline
Besenyo Dateline
Bulgar Dateline
Huns Dateline
Karluk Dateline
Khazar Dateline
Kimak Dateline
Kipchak Dateline
Kyrgyz Dateline
Sabir Dateline
Seyanto Dateline

SUMERIAN-TÜRKIC LEXICAL CONVERGENCES

I.M.Miziev
History of Karachai-Balkar people from ancient times to Russian annexation
As-Alan (Moscow), 1999, No 1, p. 2-197
Posting Notes

That the ancient Bulgars and modern Balkars are the same people there is no doubt, all the contradictory concoctions and propaganda notwithstanding. Like the modern Danube Bulgars, their self-name is B'lkar/B'lgar with an unclear semi-vowel after the initial B, that vowel is variously phonetized by their neighbors as a, o, and u. Balkars live in the heart of the ancient Great Bulgaria, and for the last two millennia preserved both their original name B'lkar and appellation Alan. A small survivor of the numerous people, Balkars did not have any more chances to preserve their original Ogur-type language than had the Middle Age Anglos in England or Celts in France, but they carry the Ogur substrate that is invaluable in reconstructions of the original Bulgar language, complemented by the traces of the Bulgar language in the modern Ukrainian, Danube Bulgar, Hungarian, Itil Tatar, Chuvash, Russian, Rumanian, Serbian, Croatian, and Mari languages. Long neglected, and politically precarious, that work is already going on, bringing a better understanding not only of the Bulgar language, but also of the Ogur language of the Huns.

The offered excerpt was published in 1999, when genetics was only coming out of age, and the author I.M.Miziev could not even suspect that his analysis will be so accurately confirmed by the results of genetic studies.

Phonetic conventions:
y - after consonant in the middle and in the end of the word, like 'i' in 'sit', with a longer sound, corresponds to Russian ű: 'Bulymer ' for 'Boo-liih-mer', 'Ryshtauly' for 'Riish-tah-oo-liih'.
y - substitutes for 'i' in diphthongs, to indicate sound like Y in New York: 'biysu' for 'Bee-y-soo', instead of 'biisu', yorty for 'Yor-tii'.
j - like 'j' in 'jealousy', 'z' in 'azure'

Posting notes are highlighted in blue or in blue boxes.

I.M.Miziev
History of Karachai-Balkar people from ancient times to Russian annexation

EXPANSION OF PRA-TÜRKS TO S. CAUCASUS AND NEAR EAST

In last third of the 3rd millennium BC, kurgans started penetrating from the Northern to the Southern Caucasus, through the Derbent pass (Dagestan) and the west of the Black Sea routes. This paths of expansion can be visibly traced by the kurgans near Novotitarevka stan and aul (village - Translator's Note) Utamysh in Dagestan. S. Caucasian archeologists are unanimous that the Kurgan culture appears suddenly there, as a completely alien phenomenon for the local tribes. These monuments are known in many areas of the S. Caucasia, but the earliest are kurgans located near the village Bedeni in Georgia, and the Uch-tepe the kurgans in the Azerbaijan, etc.

From here, further to the south, the Kurgan culture reaches the banks of the lake Urmia in the Middle East.

The ancient Kurgan culture of the horse, cattle and sheep breeders for the first time met settled agricultural tribes in the territory of the S. Caucasia, Near East and Asia Minor. Has developed a natural symbiosis of two cultures, and different ethno-cultural communities amalgamated. As a result of this symbiosis, evolved a new settled agricultural and cattle breeding ethnic community, which combined both types of the economic production.

Posting Note

The southward migration of the Kurgan people from the N.Pontic area has left not only archeological traces, but also genetical traces. A closer look into sequential development of the human alleles sampled from different geographical locations allows not only to trace the movement of the people, but associate their movement with the dating of the archeological markers, and with the speed of the biological and glottochronological clocks, providing a panorama corroborated by intrinsically independent scientific methods. “In its entirety, the theory of the (M.Gimbutas) “Kurgan Culture” as an “Indo-European” was one ceaseless mishap. Were transposed the migratory flows, their directions (westward and eastward), timing of these flows (6-5 thousand years ago and 5-3 thousand years ago), the origin (tribal affiliation) of the migrants (R1a and R1b), their linguistic classification (Aryans and Türks). It seems that the desire of the authors and supporters of the (M.Gimbutas) Kurgan theory as “Indo-European” to persuade others in their accuracy did not allow them to consider alternatives, as is due in the science. Naturally, that mishap could not address the tribal affiliation, such information did not exist then” [A.Klyosov, 2010, The principal mystery in the relationship of Indo-European and Türkic linguistic families, p. 23].

The sequential development of the human alleles indicates that the peoples of Siberia, Volga, Kama, Central Asia, and the ancient peoples of the Middle Volga, Samara, Khvalyn, the ancient Pit Grave or “Kurgan” archaeological cultures, cultural and cultural-historical communities, and some Caucasian peoples, all speaking Türkic languages, were haplogroup type R1b1, and perhaps the kindred tribes Q and N, and they partially retained R1b1, which by the time of 6,000 years ago has become a haplogroup R1b1b2. Haplogroup R1b1b2 originated in the Caucasus and tails off to Europe. The common European ancestors of R1b1b2 lived 6,000 years ago in the Caucasus and 5,500 years ago in Anatolia, 5,300 years ago in the Middle East, and 4,500-3,600 years ago in Europe. The European haplotypes of the R1b1b2 group are so young (in terms of the DNA genealogy) that many still retain the ancestral haplotype of 4,000 years ago (shown here in the 12-marker format)
:13-24-14-11-11-14-12-12 -12-13-13-16
It is called “Atlantic modal haplotype”, because it was first identified in the haplotype study of the British Isles. In abridged version, without lateral branches, the subsequent post-Caucasian development of the subgroups looks as follows:
R1b1b2a (L23) => R1b1b2a1 (L51) => R1b1b2a1a (L11) => R1b1b2a1a2 (P312) => R1b1b2a1a2d (U152) => R1b1b2a1a2d3 (L2) => R1b1b2a1a2de3a (L20),
in parallel R1b1b2a1a (L11) => R1b1b2a1a1 (U106) => R1b1b2a1a1a (U198), R1b1b2a1a1c (L1), R1b1b2a1a1d (L48) => R1b1b2a1a1d1 (L47) => R1b1b2a1a1d1a (L44) => R1b1b2a1a1d1a1 (L164),
and in parallel down to R1b1b2a1a2f (L21) => R1b1b2a1a2f2 (M222), R1b1b2a1a2f3 (P66), R1b1b2a1a2f4 (L226), R1b1b2a1a2f5 (L193) [Paraphrasing A.Klyosov, 2010, The principal mystery in the relationship of Indo-European and Türkic linguistic families, pp. 6-12].

This symbiosis in the territory of the ancient Mesopotamia, (modern Iraq) gives a huge push to the establishment of the world-renowned civilization of Sumer (Somar, Suvar). Between the carriers of the Maykop cultures of the Northern Caucasus and the ancient Sumers (Suvars, Somars) developed tight cultural and economic relations, displayed by repeated finds, in the Sumerian cities and Maykop kurgans, of the similar distinct arms, ornaments, etc. It is important to note that these objects are found in the Sumerian cities and in the North Caucasian Maykop kurgans, but they are almost never found in the monuments in the territory between them, neither in the S. Caucasia, nor in the other areas of the Northern Caucasus. The mutual contacts between the Maykopians and Sumerians are like the relations between long-separated parts of the ancient pra-Türkic tribes with their ancestral home in the Northern Caucasus and adjoining  Eurasian steppes. The impression is that these connections had transitive character, probably, explained by the closeness of their traditions and cultures.

There is plenty of evidence that the ancient Sumerians were a long separated part from the main pra-Türkic tribes. Therefore, in their language are many Türkic words, written about by many scientists of the last century and of today.

SUMERIAN-KARACHAEVO-BALKARIAN LEXICAL CONVERGENCIES

The analysis of the ancient Sumerian cuneiform texts performed by many scientists testifies that the majority of the Sumerian words are literally duplicates of the common  Türkic words, including the Karachaevo-Balkarian words, and sometimes of the whole phrases. For example, in a song about Gilgamesh (Bilgamesh) is a Balkarian phrase "Soüm eteyik", i.e. "We will make a sacrifice, we shall sacrifice". Or in the monument of the 24 c. BC, the inscription devoted to the God Gudey, contains a Karachaevo-Balkarian expression "zanymdagynnan", i.e. "From a close one". There are many of such distinctive coincidences.

Such conjunctions are multiple, there are more than 4 hundred of them. But the shown conjunctions are enough to affirm the kihship of the Sumerian and Karachaevo-Balkarian languages.

The scientific data tells that the spread of the ancient pra-Türkic of the Kurgan culture was a result of a split of the ancient Turkic community, originally represented by the Kurgan-Afanasian ethno-cultural community. This dissolution chronologically coincided with the disintegration of the ancient Indo-European community. The mutual impingements resulting of these processes are reflected in the observed mass of the mutually penetrating linguistic convergences between the Türkic and Indo-European languages.

The name of the God Gudey is amazingly close to the word Kuday, "God" in the Kazakh and Kirgiz languages. The word Khuday, also spelled Khudai, is a prominent Türkic theonym, meaning "God", "Almighty", "Supreme" etc. In the Bashkort, Khuday means "spirit", in the Tatar it means  "God", the White Hun's history as early as 2 c. AD notes a royal name Haphtar Hudai, it is a popular name with the meaning of "God" in Pakhtu. The Internet search for "Khudai" returned me 6,000 entries. Looks like 4,000 years ago Sumerians were experts in propagating their religious concepts.

Let's review several Sumerian-Karachaevo-Balkarian lexical convergencies:

Sumerian words Karachaevo - Balkarian words
Abame elder Appa grandfather, grandmother
Alty six Alty six
Az little, few Az little, few
Aur weight Auur weight
Baba ancestor Baba ancestor
Buz to break Buz to break
Char circle Charkh wheel
Chibin fly (n) Chibin fly (n)
Cholpan star Cholpan star (Venus)
Daim continously Dayim continously
Ed come out pass (v)
Egech sister Egech sister
El death El to die
Er warrior Er man
Eshik door Eshik door
Ez self Ez self
Gaba breast Gabara breastwarmer, bra
Gag to thrust K'ak to thrust
Guruvash servant Karauash servant, slave girl
Jau enemy Jau enemy
Jer place, ground Jer place, ground
Ikki two Eki two
Irik valuh (?) Irik valuh (?)
Kadau lock (n) K'adau lock (n)
Kal to remain K'al to remain
Kan blood Kan blood
Koru to guard K'oruu to guard
Kush bird K'ush bird
Kur to create Kur to build
Küre to row Küre to row
Kyz girl K'yz girl
Me I, me Men I, me
Mu he Bu he
Ne what Ne what
Or to press Or harvest (v.and n.)
Ru to hammer Ur to hammer
San number San number
    Sana to count
Sen you Sen you
Sig kick Sok to beat
Süz to filter Süz to filter
Ush three Uch three
Ud fire Ot fire
Uzuk long Uzun long
Tu to give birth Tuu to give birth
Tud to be born Tuudu to be born
Tush to sit down, to go down Tüsh to descend
Uat to break Uat to break
Üz to tear Üz to tear
Ul clan Ul son, descendant
Yaryk light (adj) Yaryk light (adj)
Yarym half Yarym half
Yaz to write Yaz to write
Yol road Yol road
Yün wool Yün wool
Yyr song Yyr song

 

WHY?

Home
Back
In Russian
Türkic-Sumerian
Datelines
Sources
Roots
Alphabet
Writing
Language
Religion
Genetics
Geography
Archeology
Religion
Coins
Wikipedia
Ogur and Oguz
Türkic languages
Classification of Türkic languages
Indo-European, Dravidian, and Rigveda
Türkic and European Genetic distance
Türkic in Slavic
Türkic in English
Türkic, Slavic and Iranian
Türkic in Romance
Alans in Pyrenees
Türkic in Greek
Türkic-Etruscan
Alan Dateline
Avar Dateline
Besenyo Dateline
Bulgar Dateline
Huns Dateline
Karluk Dateline
Khazar Dateline
Kimak Dateline
Kipchak Dateline
Kyrgyz Dateline
Sabir Dateline
Seyanto Dateline
4/20/2006
Đĺéňčíă@Mail.ru “”–